From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: turning on global-font-lock-mode by default?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:01:07 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dr0uB-0002Nt-Et@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200503292336.j2TNavAH014494@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1DGfvj-00048G-Qx@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200507072109.j67L9vKE000484@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1Dqkbg-0003QC-HZ@fencepost.gnu.org> <858y0hlq1z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120862224 21543 80.91.229.2 (8 Jul 2005 22:37:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:37:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 00:37:03 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dr1Sf-0000oV-ID
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 00:36:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dr1U6-0000s3-FU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:38:14 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dr1Tu-0000rU-Cu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:38:02 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dr1N5-0006kU-R4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:31:10 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dr1N4-0006Ol-Lh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:30:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dr13V-0003i9-W2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:10:46 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dr0uB-0002Nt-Et; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:01:07 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <858y0hlq1z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:23:04 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40664
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40664

    Does setting gc-cons-threshold to a small value like 4000 increase the
    likelihood of the crash?  It's one of the things I try on sporadic
    problems.

Remember that these crashes usually happen days or weeks apart.  I
don't want to run in such a slow mode all the time, sorry.