From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Incorrect indentation after :name
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:36:51 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dqkbb-0003Pi-2z@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87mzozfh6w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICGEGGCKAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<?fnord?873bqq33rg.fsf@ID-97657.user.individual.net>
	<f7ccd24b050707114922f61259@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120799062 7345 80.91.229.2 (8 Jul 2005 05:04:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 05:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 07:04:13 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dql1q-00009g-22
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 07:03:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dql3E-0005bd-NY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:05:24 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dqkzw-0003m3-6S
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:02:00 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dqkyb-0003Kl-NC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:00:37 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqkyY-00038z-Ld
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:00:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dqkkg-0000DT-F7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:46:14 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dqkbb-0003Pi-2z; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:36:51 -0400
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <f7ccd24b050707114922f61259@mail.gmail.com> (message from Juanma
	Barranquero on Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:49:17 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40620
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40620

    If you mean that `if's are:

    (if x
	(a)
      (b)
      (c))

    instead of:

    (if x
	(a)
	(b)
	(c))

    I would consider this a clear advantage.

I am not sure which of the two you are preferring.  However, I can
state that the first pattern above is the way Emacs is supposed to
indent an if expression.

This is not going to be changed--please let's not spend time talking
about such a change.