From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: defcustom for exec-path - is the type correct?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:35:24 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DqkaC-0003GJ-LZ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <42CC555C.3060801@student.lu.se>
	<E1DqP3v-00051U-Vl@fencepost.gnu.org> <42CCCF20.9040905@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120798853 6921 80.91.229.2 (8 Jul 2005 05:00:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 05:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 07:00:50 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dqkyc-0008Ll-4e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 07:00:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dql00-0003c5-HQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:02:04 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DqkzZ-0003bV-6E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:01:37 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DqkzY-0003bJ-HU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:01:36 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqkyc-00038z-AM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:00:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DqkjH-000086-W3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:44:48 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DqkaC-0003GJ-LZ; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:35:24 -0400
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <42CCCF20.9040905@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:43:44 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40616
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40616

    Oh, sorry, I thought it was easy to see.

This illustrates the general principle: no matter how visible and
obvious you think the misbehavior is, you should always say explicitly
what it is, in your bug report.