From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incorrect indentation after :name Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:30:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <42C80B48.3080103@student.lu.se> <87r7edhlsu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200507060020.j660KVL21546@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <85ekabrdma.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87mzozfh6w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120773941 22726 80.91.229.2 (7 Jul 2005 22:05:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 00:05:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqeUi-0003y5-Jf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:05:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqeW6-0003Ty-5S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DqeRg-0000ts-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DqeLb-0007dg-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqeLb-0007S9-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:55:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dqe6C-0001qJ-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DqdxD-0004Vf-FV; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:30:43 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <87mzozfh6w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:09:17 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40599 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40599 Let's not try to be too clever. After all, there's also the other cases like: (quote (function and function)) vs (quote (function of something)) That case is not important, for reasons I explained before. and '(... (function and function) ...) vs '(... (function of something) ...) You are talking about constants which are not expressions but which contain expressions. They do occur, but in practice, would indenting them as expressions ever give bad results?