From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: defcustom for exec-path - is the type correct?
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:36:39 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DqP3v-00051U-Vl@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <42CC555C.3060801@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120715882 5903 80.91.229.2 (7 Jul 2005 05:58:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 05:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 07:57:55 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DqPOT-0005IE-I9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:57:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DqPPm-0005rr-DK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:59:14 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DqPLJ-0004ld-I6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:54:37 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DqPL5-0004cC-Rc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:54:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqPL2-0004SV-2D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:54:22 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DqPCh-0001aV-SU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:45:43 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DqP3v-00051U-Vl; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:36:40 -0400
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <42CC555C.3060801@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:04:12 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40529
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40529

    I just did M-x customize-option RET exec-path RET.

    I think the type for exec-path looks wrong. What do you think?

It looks right to me.

When you report a problem, please describe what aspect of the
behavior you think is wrong.  This is important so that we
don't have to just scratch our heads, wondering whether we
see the problem or not.