From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incorrect indentation after :name Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:55:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <42C80B48.3080103@student.lu.se> <87r7edhlsu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200507060020.j660KVL21546@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120673087 5804 80.91.229.2 (6 Jul 2005 18:04:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 06 20:04:45 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqEFS-0001Sl-D2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:03:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqEGm-0001Ct-46 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DqEBC-00089K-Mb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DqEB7-00085d-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqEB6-00083x-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DqEFp-0001ev-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DqE7D-0000AL-DK; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:55:19 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200507060020.j660KVL21546@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:20:31 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40506 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40506 If I understood correctly, it would misindent quoted lists whose first element is a function. Lists of functions are not rare (hooks, for example). The incorrect indentation in those cases won't be horrible. However, if we can develop a good convention for distinguishing the two cases (quoted code, and quoted non-code), we could get the right results every time.