From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Darwin support for lisp/battery.el.
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:51:36 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DpSIK-0001W9-6W@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <8764vtxusp.fsf@xs4all.nl> <E1DpBIo-00026G-Ig@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<85mzp3a8am.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120489619 17948 80.91.229.2 (4 Jul 2005 15:06:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 15:06:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 04 17:06:56 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DpSW7-0006Pk-97
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 17:05:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DpSXK-00038V-6i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 11:07:06 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DpSWR-0002vJ-Fp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 11:06:12 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DpSWI-0002qb-JP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 11:06:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpSWH-0002le-W4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 11:06:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DpSQE-0003g2-OL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:59:46 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DpSIK-0001W9-6W; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:51:36 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85mzp3a8am.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:28:33 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40333
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40333

    But the communication is just with the kernel, via the proc file
    system.

If this comment should talk about the kernels, that is ok.  Just as
long as it does so in a clear and unambiguous way, that reinforces
the distinction between the kernels and the larger systems.