From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xterm colors (was: Diff mode faces) Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:17:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oea5urwm.fsf@jurta.org> <87psujj0h0.fsf@jurta.org> <86hdfv1y9b.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <87r7eyqzcy.fsf@jurta.org> <200506191710.j5JHAEN11479@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <877jgfi40l.fsf@jurta.org> <87acl6aw9w.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120458452 842 80.91.229.2 (4 Jul 2005 06:27:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 06:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 04 08:27:23 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpKQ9-0006zz-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:27:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpKRK-0006zK-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DpKO0-0006Kq-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DpKNy-0006II-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpKNx-000676-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:24:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DpKOb-0006Ja-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DpKGo-0003OI-NK; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:17:30 -0400 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: (gaetan.leurent@ens.fr) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40310 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40310 The colors used by xterm can be changed through X resources, so the colors defined in xterm-standard-colors are maybe not the ones that are actually used. I don't know if we should do anything too smart with them. Or do you expect users to modify xterm-standard-colors if they change their xterm colors ? Since there is no way for Emacs to respond automatically to such customization of Xterm, let's not worry about it. There are many ways they can customize Emacs for this.