From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)] Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:49:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877jgrj22g.fsf_-_@marant.org> <87mzp9bnrm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <20050630043416.GA14713@math.berkeley.edu> <20050630053339.GA14841@math.berkeley.edu> <20050630070427.GA15050@math.berkeley.edu> <20050630183237.GA16162@math.berkeley.edu> <20050701230618.GA19693@math.berkeley.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120406868 8932 80.91.229.2 (3 Jul 2005 16:07:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 16:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmarant@free.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, cperl@ilyaz.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 18:07:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6zm-0002uA-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:07:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp70v-0000Cs-UM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:08:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6vD-0006Wg-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6uz-0006PM-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6uy-0006AL-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dp6qM-0007sz-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Dp6il-0005tI-18; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:49:27 -0400 Original-To: Ilya Zakharevich In-reply-to: <20050701230618.GA19693@math.berkeley.edu> (message from Ilya Zakharevich on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:06:18 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40221 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40221 My point is that most edits must be removed, since they introduce much more problems than they fix. Removing them is fine, as long as the important problems we fixed get fixed some other way.