From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Underlining in compile.el
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:17:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dn7XJ-0000jw-96@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICIENFCJAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119933442 21167 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2005 04:37:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 06:37:10 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7p8-0007uC-GC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:35:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7wu-0005Jo-H0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:43:52 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7pJ-0001UT-0c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:36:01 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7pA-0001Op-Gh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:35:52 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7pA-0001DS-5z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:35:52 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dn7d5-0004X9-U0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:23:23 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dn7XJ-0000jw-96; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:17:25 -0400
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICIENFCJAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39736
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39736

    If compile and grep buffers had full-line links, the links would be easier
    to access, they would help with visual alignment (like using a ruler in a
    parts catalog), and there would be no need to underline them.

I see.  However, we don't want mouse-1 to be active on the whole line,
for other reasons.  I think the current set of places where mouse-1 is
active is the right set.  The question that remains is only whether
to underline those places.