From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: File menu changes (suggestions) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:38:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119853594 29683 80.91.229.2 (27 Jun 2005 06:26:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 08:26:32 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmn4h-0002LX-B6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:26:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmnCH-00073P-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmmgy-0003rJ-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmmgu-0003pW-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:01:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmmgr-0003R7-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DmmPP-0003bY-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DmmJw-0004Ln-0E; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:38:12 -0400 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:53:41 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39615 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39615 FWIW, I see nothing wrong with "Unsplit". At least one other GUI program uses "Remove split", which is very similar; if that is better, let's use it. It isn't better a priori, but if it is widely used and lots of people would have seen it, that would make it better. What other programs use "Remove split"? How about "Only One Window"? I think that is better than just "One Window". The word "Only" carries the implication of getting rid of the rest. Or maybe "Just This Window", which indicates that the selected window is the one that will remain. What do people think of "Just This Window"? >"One Window" (my original suggestion) says just as much. > >My other original suggestion, "Delete Other Windows" is clearest: the >command just deletes the other windows. Maximize? "Maximize" is associated with frames, so people would get the wrong idea.