From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New dumping problem... Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:54:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20050618.020729.192953061.jet@gyve.org> <20050618.122801.78242809.jet@gyve.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119488010 19448 80.91.229.2 (23 Jun 2005 00:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jet@gyve.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 02:53:27 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DlFxs-0008Tx-EL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:53:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DlG28-0005q9-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DlG1P-0005nV-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DlG1L-0005ks-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DlG1K-0005jt-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DlG39-0004M4-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DlFz4-000836-2D; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:54:22 -0400 Original-To: Katsumi Yamaoka In-reply-to: (message from Katsumi Yamaoka on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:20:38 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39334 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39334 There's no way for unprivileged users to avoid the problem that the Fedora Core 4 eats the C-SPC key. By the way, Emacs built with the `--without-xim' option has no problem for fetching the C-SPC key. Those two statements seem to contradict each other, so I do not understand. Which of these two is the case? * Nonprivileged Emacs users can avoid the C-SPC problem by building Emacs with `--without-xim'. * Nonprivileged Emacs users cannot avoid the C-SPC problem.