From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: debug-on-entry question
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:54:17 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DlFyz-00082Z-P3@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3vf4c2d8s.fsf@jrwork.burla> <873breo37h.fsf@jurta.org>
	<87psuhncy2.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87r7evzmry.fsf@jurta.org>
	<E1Dkw6C-0005RX-4p@fencepost.gnu.org> <871x6u7pwv.fsf@xs4all.nl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119487941 19271 80.91.229.2 (23 Jun 2005 00:52:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 02:52:20 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DlFww-0008Jz-BB
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:52:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DlG3f-0006mZ-CR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:59:07 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DlG1P-0005nU-2C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:47 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DlG1K-0005l6-RL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:43 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DlG1K-0005jt-Mx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DlG34-0004Lo-Ud
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:58:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DlFyz-00082Z-P3; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:54:17 -0400
Original-To: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <871x6u7pwv.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Wed, 22
	Jun 2005 10:32:16 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39332
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39332

    But I still like to apply the patch for debug-on-entry as is.  Besides
    using function-called-at-point, it also filters out special forms
    (which can't be set to break on entry).  Is that Ok?

Yes.