From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: debug-on-entry question
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:40:24 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dkw6C-0005RX-4p@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3vf4c2d8s.fsf@jrwork.burla> <873breo37h.fsf@jurta.org>
	<87psuhncy2.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87r7evzmry.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119412820 29299 80.91.229.2 (22 Jun 2005 04:00:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 22 06:00:16 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkwPP-0004oz-SC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:00:16 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkwVy-0000QC-1T
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:07:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkwPS-00063D-74
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:18 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkwPH-00060A-Vx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkwPG-0005nz-IT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DkwA2-0002dy-8x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:44:22 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dkw6C-0005RX-4p; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:40:24 -0400
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <87r7evzmry.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 21
	Jun 2005 19:32:17 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39269
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39269

    There are other commands using `a' letter to read function names (like
    `elp-instrument-function', etc.) where getting the default function name
    from the current buffer would be useful too.  So maybe it's better to
    implement this in `call-interactively' for all commands using `a'?

That seems like a good idea.