From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Diff mode faces
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:50:10 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DkDIY-0004Jp-VV@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87oea5urwm.fsf@jurta.org> <E1DjSxE-0003UZ-Rz@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<871x6zdcmq.fsf@jurta.org> <E1Djqpp-0003jB-S4@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87ekaymnzv.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119239672 3733 80.91.229.2 (20 Jun 2005 03:54:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 05:54:25 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkDMb-0007wy-B2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:54:21 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkDSk-0004Y5-BM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:00:42 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkDRb-0003ys-3P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:59:31 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DkDRY-0003x0-5a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:59:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkDRY-0003th-39
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:59:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DkDLg-000066-Qv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:53:24 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DkDIY-0004Jp-VV; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:50:10 -0400
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <87ekaymnzv.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 19
	Jun 2005 17:05:32 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39141
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39141

    BTW, font-lock-comment-delimiter-face as well as font-lock-negation-char-face
    are very new faces, so it's better to remove the -face suffix from them now
    than to create aliases for backward compatibility later after the release.

Maybe, but currently all the faces defined by font-lock have
names ending in -face.

Perhaps we should change them all now, since so many other faces
have been renamed.  If so, I think it would be good to add
parallel aliases even for the faces that are new, just so that
all the faces have them in the same way.