From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: TTY Vertical divider face?
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:51:03 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Djqpr-0003jN-DB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <hbis11fn9l.wl%len@reeltwo.com> <hb7jhff4jy.wl%len@reeltwo.com>
	<87zmu07i67.fsf@jurta.org> <E1DiJwj-0008Pr-D1@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<877jgroo1i.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119153252 11674 80.91.229.2 (19 Jun 2005 03:54:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: len@reeltwo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 19 05:54:04 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Djqsl-0007qJ-8Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:54:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Djqyh-0005bj-Hv
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:00:11 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Djqw7-0004hY-HW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:57:31 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Djqw2-0004f6-UW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:57:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Djqw2-0004dA-2a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:57:26 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Djqsg-0007dP-2v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:53:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Djqpr-0003jN-DB; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:51:03 -0400
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <877jgroo1i.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sat, 18
	Jun 2005 16:59:29 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39100
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39100

    > However, on principle it seems wrong to use mode-line-inactive
    > directly.  There ought to be a separate named face to control this.
    > It could default to mode-line-inactive.

    How about adding this face now?

Please do.