From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Version of the Lisp Manual.
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:40:16 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DgOCe-0002W2-Tw@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87acm1dsyb.fsf@xs4all.nl> <uacm0ap1k.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87oeagambh.fsf@xs4all.nl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118330546 29682 80.91.229.2 (9 Jun 2005 15:22:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 17:22:20 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DgOiK-00024j-RZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:13:01 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DgOpH-0002R5-62
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:20:11 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DgOhJ-0004Cy-5M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:11:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DgOhG-0004CM-6e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:11:54 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgOYG-00017A-0l
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:02:36 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DgOCv-00020c-6e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:40:33 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DgOCe-0002W2-Tw; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:40:16 -0400
Original-To: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <87oeagambh.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Wed, 08
	Jun 2005 17:40:50 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38444
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38444

    Why not let the edition of the manual equal the version of Emacs?

They do not necessarily correspond in a simple way.

I'm not going to change this, so please drop the issue.