From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: org-mode and mode hooks. Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:01:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y8a3mnz8.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87ll63weye.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505252135.j4PLZvt26969@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87hdgrufcl.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505260359.j4Q3xbj28809@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87is16rsid.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505261501.j4QF17h00246@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87psveq60w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505271717.j4RHHGD07067@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200505290157.j4T1vus10117@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200505292354.j4TNsTE13354@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200505311544.j4VFijq17680@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506011911.j51JBR025269@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87oeap231t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200506012242.j51MgBj26277@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87r7flpubg.fs Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117786683 26627 80.91.229.2 (3 Jun 2005 08:18:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mmaug@yahoo.com, dominik@science.uva.nl, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 03 10:17:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1De7N5-00064k-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:17:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1De7Sk-0003qA-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:23:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1De7N7-00022r-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1De7Jn-0001Pc-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1De7JR-00015C-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1De7B6-0001QQ-Ce for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:05:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1De77a-0000X8-My; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:01:38 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200506012349.j51NnUA26352@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:49:30 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38066 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38066 The only difference between the following patch to font-lock.el and the previous one are two doc fixes. After those doc fixes, everything should work as documented when my three patches are applied. In that case, my previous comments about the previous patch still apply to this one. I received many long messages yesterday about this issue. What conclusions were reached from them?