From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.mail.mh-e.devel
Subject: Re: The MH-E repository
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:47:49 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DdAqD-0001Jo-Q2@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <25625.1117492799@olgas.newt.com>
	<m3is0zwz6w.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <65625.1117534023@juniper.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117561688 1979 80.91.229.2 (31 May 2005 17:48:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:48:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 19:48:07 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DdApe-0000Ur-G5
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 19:47:14 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DdAum-0003GR-Dk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:52:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DdAtl-0003Di-PU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:51:29 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DdAtk-0003D3-D3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:51:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DdAtk-0003CD-7v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:51:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DdAss-0006Nh-H3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:50:34 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DdAqD-0001Jo-Q2; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:47:49 -0400
Original-To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <65625.1117534023@juniper.net> (mdb@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37949 gmane.mail.mh-e.devel:10448
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37949

    > Have they signed papers for MH-E only, or general past/future changes
    > for emacs as a whole?

    It seems to be a mixture right now.

How, specifically, does that matter?