From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: org-mode and mode hooks. Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 08:04:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y8a3mnz8.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87ll63weye.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505252135.j4PLZvt26969@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87hdgrufcl.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505260359.j4Q3xbj28809@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87is16rsid.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505261501.j4QF17h00246@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87psveq60w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505271717.j4RHHGD07067@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200505290220.j4T2Kc010172@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117369669 9348 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2005 12:27:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, dominik@science.uva.nl, mmaug@yahoo.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 29 14:27:46 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcMsu-0007k0-Np for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 14:27:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcMxa-0005pT-6w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DcMhj-00069u-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DcMhh-000696-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:15:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcMhF-0005mH-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:15:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DcMYx-0002mZ-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DcMX3-0006yh-8q; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:04:41 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200505290220.j4T2Kc010172@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 28 May 2005 21:20:38 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37850 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37850 Hopefully, we are only talking about Font Lock. The new patch to font-core makes font-lock-mode issue a warning, thereby taking care of Stefan's objection. It sounds like you are saying that with your patch, Font Lock mode still works wrong. And all the patch does is warn the user when it works wrong. Do I understand right? If so, that means this fix doesn't fix things. We need to figure out what to do about Font Lock mode. Can you explain the problem with Font Lock mode that remains after your proposed patch?