From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: trivial bug of font-lock in Change Log mode.
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 07:52:54 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dbzs6-0004uY-VM@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Db6jn-0004kV-00@etlken>
	<E1DbJkb-0008KT-TG@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1DbSmG-0003Ra-00@etlken>
	<E1DbfhE-0004ZY-JC@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1DbpVP-0002nK-00@etlken>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117282210 30784 80.91.229.2 (28 May 2005 12:10:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 28 14:10:01 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dc07z-0003FX-Jq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 14:09:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dc0CS-000179-MQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 08:13:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dc024-00036Q-Cx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 08:03:15 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dc01s-0002uL-Sr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 08:03:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dc00x-0002Ib-Gk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 08:02:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dbztg-00059d-9Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 07:54:32 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dbzs6-0004uY-VM; Sat, 28 May 2005 07:52:55 -0400
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1DbpVP-0002nK-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Sat, 28
	May 2005 09:48:47 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37826
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37826

    Anyway, I think this kind of discussion is useless unless we
    know what kind of date format we are going to support.  For
    instance, the current one doesn't handle this kind of date
    format (note "JST"):

    Sat May 28 09:41:40 JST 2005

The idea is to handle date formats that were actually used in change
logs, now or in the past.  We don't want to aim to handle all date formats
that people use in other contexts.

I recall that we did previously use a different date format.
I don't remember what it was, but maybe you can find it from
old versions of add-log.el.