From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: log-edit.el
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:40:22 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DbVhu-0007Te-PB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17044.23349.76511.530320@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<E1DbBQU-00049c-Dg@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17045.27998.685459.449531@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117165632 1185 80.91.229.2 (27 May 2005 03:47:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 03:47:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 05:47:03 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DbVnA-00068J-U1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 05:45:49 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DbVrM-0004hj-W6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:50:09 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DbVp6-0003gu-OM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:47:48 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DbVp2-0003eQ-Lw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:47:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbVp2-0003c6-FC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:47:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DbVj2-0001kH-Kh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:41:32 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DbVhu-0007Te-PB; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:40:22 -0400
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <17045.27998.685459.449531@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Thu, 26 May 2005 18:31:58 +1200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37751
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37751

     >     OK, I will merge the node "Editing a Log Message" from the pcl-cvs manual
     >     into the node "Features of the Log Entry Buffer" in the Emacs manual.

    Its just a statement of intent.

Ok, but you did not say so.

    Compare that to the changes in make-mode.el.
    Who, apart from the author and perhaps yourself, knows whats thats all about?

That shouldn't be the standard of comparison.
We all agree he should not have done that.