From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: mouse-face on mode-line and header-line
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 06:27:40 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DaWdQ-0006gy-7O@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20050513.230546.243438712.jet@gyve.org>
	<20050522.113905.183047209.jet@gyve.org>
	<17042.19037.806322.765385@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<f7ccd24b050523145425281a06@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116931093 15933 80.91.229.2 (24 May 2005 10:38:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:38:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 12:38:11 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaWjo-0002G0-92
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 12:34:16 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaWnR-00034Q-UO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:38:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaWln-0002SR-1A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:36:19 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaWlj-0002PX-Lj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:36:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DaWlg-0002KV-QH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:36:13 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DaWde-0006Vr-JO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:27:54 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DaWdQ-0006gy-7O; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:27:40 -0400
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <f7ccd24b050523145425281a06@mail.gmail.com> (message from Juanma
	Barranquero on Mon, 23 May 2005 23:54:16 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37564
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37564

    Well, perhaps installing non-bug-fixing changes to xdisp.c in the
    middle of a code freeze was not the greatest idea.

This was not a new feature.  It was a change to make a general feature
work in a case where it simply failed to operate.