From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: BDF files
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:04:41 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DaDXt-0008A7-AS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <quack.20050522T1732.877jhqvl2o@quack.cs.berkeley.edu>
	<200505230053.JAA13748@etlken.m17n.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116857415 30883 80.91.229.2 (23 May 2005 14:10:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:10:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: quarl@cs.berkeley.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 16:10:10 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaDbk-0001UI-Bf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:08:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaDdC-00030U-9b
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:10:10 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaDci-0002vA-6Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:09:40 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DaDcX-0002q4-FO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:09:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DaDcW-0002pW-UK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:09:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DaDi4-00013a-29
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:15:12 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DaDXt-0008A7-AS; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:04:41 -0400
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <200505230053.JAA13748@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi
	Handa on Mon, 23 May 2005 09:53:14 +0900 (JST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37515
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37515

    At the beginning I listed only the files in intlfonts
    package and it doesn't include iso10646 fonts.  But, someone
    (I forgot) compiled those files and built iso10646 fonts
    (e.g. etl24-unicode.bdf).  And someone added them in
    ps-mule.el.

Are these fonts free?