From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: the new makefile faces
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 02:49:46 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DYeqo-0000CC-1Y@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200505180616.j4I6GO8t027874@amrm2.ics.uci.edu>
	<m2mzqssa47.fsf@80363334.dynamic.ucsd.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116488264 2527 80.91.229.2 (19 May 2005 07:37:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 07:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 19 09:37:32 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DYfYx-0007F1-Ey
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 09:35:24 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DYfbY-0008D6-6A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 03:38:04 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DYfHn-00052M-1G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 03:17:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DYfCX-0003YY-4p
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 03:12:13 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYfCH-0000vA-UU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 03:11:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DYf0O-0006vx-DE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 02:59:40 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DYeqo-0000CC-1Y; Thu, 19 May 2005 02:49:47 -0400
Original-To: "Sean O'Rourke" <sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu>
In-reply-to: <m2mzqssa47.fsf@80363334.dynamic.ucsd.edu> (sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37336
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37336

      My question (which
    someone else has raised as well) is whether anyone but the author
    actually likes these changes.

I am also interested in the answer to that question.