From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: flyspell bug Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:29:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <01c5531e$Blat.v2.4$ea8d9a00@zahav.net.il> <87zmv3rg09.fsf_-_@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115829024 26012 80.91.229.2 (11 May 2005 16:30:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: S.J.Eglen@damtp.cam.ac.uk, mange@freemail.hu, public@heslin.eclipse.co.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 18:30:21 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVu45-0004el-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 18:28:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVuCr-0001bt-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DVu9e-00072v-VP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DVu9a-000713-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVu9a-0006zv-OQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DVuCf-0000Xs-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DVu55-0003pt-J4; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:29:07 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87zmv3rg09.fsf_-_@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 10 May 2005 03:06:48 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36984 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36984 ispell.el shouldn't insist on using "aspell" instead of "ispell" even when aspell executable happens to be in exec-path. Of course it should. aspell is a GNU package. What led you to think the contrary?