From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.general,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Chronological and structural link icons
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:27:19 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DVu3L-0003db-VA@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <002301c52b44$7c5edf50$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> 
	<014501c554b6$dd578a50$59cdf953@sedrcw11488>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115828540 24144 80.91.229.2 (11 May 2005 16:22:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:22:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, gtk-list@gnome.org
Original-X-From: gtk-list-bounces@gnome.org Wed May 11 18:22:17 2005
Return-path: <gtk-list-bounces@gnome.org>
Original-Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DVtxa-0003Th-Fk
	for gnome-gtk-list@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 18:21:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 632D83B1036; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248])
 by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 08195-09; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from menubar.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A1953B101B; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:28:50 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDA13B101B
	for <gtk-list@gnome.org>; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:28:48 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248])
	by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 08250-01 for <gtk-list@gnome.org>;
	Wed, 11 May 2005 12:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD473B1033
	for <gtk-list@gnome.org>; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:28:44 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DVu3L-0003db-VA; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:27:26 -0400
Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <014501c554b6$dd578a50$59cdf953@sedrcw11488>
	(lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
X-BeenThere: gtk-list@gnome.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of GTK+ <gtk-list.gnome.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list>,
	<mailto:gtk-list-request@gnome.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives>
List-Post: <mailto:gtk-list@gnome.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gtk-list-request@gnome.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list>,
	<mailto:gtk-list-request@gnome.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: gtk-list-bounces@gnome.org
Errors-To: gtk-list-bounces@gnome.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.general:11429 gmane.emacs.devel:36974
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36974

Now that Emacs has GTK support, it would be a good thing to have
consistent, standard GTK icons that make the distinctions Emacs needs
to make.  Currently we use other icons where GTK doesn't supply
standard ones, but that doesn't look very good.