From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] make-dist fixes and clean-ups Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 05:04:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87vf64bk4u.fsf@marant.org> <87d5sbcfqi.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87y8az2l7i.fsf@marant.org> <87wtq84mnx.fsf@xs4all.nl> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115716763 27752 80.91.229.2 (10 May 2005 09:19:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmarant@free.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 10 11:19:19 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVQsU-0006HZ-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:18:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVR10-0001R7-1j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:26:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DVQjZ-0000Fr-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DVQjS-00006B-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVQjR-0008T8-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DVQmW-00009M-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DVQfP-0000lz-4J; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:04:39 -0400 Original-To: Lute Kamstra In-reply-to: <87wtq84mnx.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Mon, 09 May 2005 14:19:14 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36937 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36937 What about the patch below then? It makes sure that make-dist never distributes ldefs-boot.el (that way, ldefs-boot.el will never be installed either) Why adopt that as the goal? What is wrong with distributing ldefs-boot.el? What is wrong with installing ldefs-boot.el? Unless there is some specific reason it must be excluded, I would rather include it. It is not large.