From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should killing a help or compile buffer also delete the window?
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:32:21 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DQR6r-0007th-44@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87is2c7mnx.fsf@brockman.se>
	<jwvbr82r8ed.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114525858 19415 80.91.229.2 (26 Apr 2005 14:30:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:30:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: daniel@brockman.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 26 16:30:44 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQR3K-0005T7-4I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:28:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQR93-0000w0-Qp
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:34:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQR8v-0000vo-Ru
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:34:29 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQR8v-0000vc-Cf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:34:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQR8v-0000nU-8r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:34:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DQRBM-0000ae-Fg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:37:00 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DQR6r-0007th-44; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:32:21 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvbr82r8ed.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:04:37 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36410
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36410

    I think Emacs should be a bit more aggressive about marking windows dedicated.

I'd be glad to consider specific suggestions.  People could try
implementing changes in this, and try using them; if such a change is
generally liked, we can install it.