From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist. Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:24:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zmvu6ba2.fsf@xs4all.nl> <85ll7e68ei.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <854qe2ihhi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8764yi4awh.fsf@xs4all.nl> <873btlsalu.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87pswo84vv.fsf@xs4all.nl> <857jiucz6r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114295043 1932 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2005 22:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 00:24:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPT2C-0007MB-GT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:23:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPT7O-0006JD-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPT6Y-0005zh-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPT6Y-0005zQ-20 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPT6V-0005KA-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DPT6O-0000gJ-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DPT2r-0003bl-PI; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:24:13 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <857jiucz6r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:51:40 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36313 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36313 So a better expedient would be to have (provide 'xxx) turn on the necessary action at the end of the current load file in case that the feature is provided the first time. I am not sure if this really solves any part of the question of how we might try to implement better unloading. It isn't a design for an implementation.