From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist. Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zmvu6ba2.fsf@xs4all.nl> <85ll7e68ei.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <854qe2ihhi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d5spxzml.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <85k6mxe686.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85pswp9hsu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85hdi0tp4h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114273501 19596 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2005 16:25:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 23 18:24:59 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPNQm-0008Po-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:24:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPNVv-00019r-RL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:29:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPNTI-0007s1-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPNTH-0007ra-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPNTH-0006bi-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DPNLZ-0000fu-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:19:09 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DPNHx-0007NL-BG; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:25 -0400 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:56:22 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36302 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36302 I wrote: Again: do you have knowledge of even a single instance where this alias has been used, promoted, or found convenient for or by as much as a single person? If these names are not really used by users, maybe we could these names in both AUCTeX and tex-mode.el. I meant to write: If these names are not really used by users, maybe we could eliminate these names in both AUCTeX and tex-mode.el.