* safe-get
@ 2005-04-20 21:42 Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 23:52 ` safe-get Stefan Monnier
2005-04-21 8:09 ` safe-get Kim F. Storm
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2005-04-20 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Is there a reason not to make ordinary `get' safe? That would be
simpler for Lisp programmers than introducing safe-get.
The code would be simpler, the manual would be simpler, even
etc/NEWS would be simpler.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: safe-get
2005-04-20 21:42 safe-get Richard Stallman
@ 2005-04-20 23:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-21 19:56 ` safe-get Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 8:09 ` safe-get Kim F. Storm
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2005-04-20 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel, Kim F.Storm
> Is there a reason not to make ordinary `get' safe? That would be
> simpler for Lisp programmers than introducing safe-get.
> The code would be simpler, the manual would be simpler, even
> etc/NEWS would be simpler.
Agreed. Same thing for safe-plist-get.
BTW, XEmacs has overloaded `get' so that when applied to an overlay it does
overlay-get, ...
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: safe-get
2005-04-20 21:42 safe-get Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 23:52 ` safe-get Stefan Monnier
@ 2005-04-21 8:09 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-21 19:56 ` safe-get Richard Stallman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kim F. Storm @ 2005-04-21 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> Is there a reason not to make ordinary `get' safe?
Not really, except
a) it will not catch errors in the symbol plist.
b) it is slightly slower
> That would be
> simpler for Lisp programmers than introducing safe-get.
> The code would be simpler, the manual would be simpler, even
> etc/NEWS would be simpler.
I will revert my changes, and just make get safe...
But then, why don't we make plist-get safe
and get rid of safe-plist-get, too ?
IIRC, safe-plist-get is new in 22.1, so I don't see any big
problems doing that...
--
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-21 23:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-20 21:42 safe-get Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 23:52 ` safe-get Stefan Monnier
2005-04-21 19:56 ` safe-get Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 8:09 ` safe-get Kim F. Storm
2005-04-21 19:56 ` safe-get Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 23:47 ` safe-get Kim F. Storm
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).