From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: safe-get
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:56:33 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DOhmr-000288-0y@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DOMxc-0004fa-I7@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<871x95xb6e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114113538 12333 80.91.229.2 (21 Apr 2005 19:58:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:58:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 21:58:57 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOhoc-0003YS-KH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:58:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOhtO-0006co-LR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:03:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOhoD-0004l1-Ob
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:57:57 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOhoC-0004kI-RZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:57:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOhoC-0001ON-ME
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:57:56 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DOhpl-0004Zc-MH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:59:33 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DOhmr-000288-0y; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:56:33 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <871x95xb6e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:52:00 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36252
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36252

    BTW, XEmacs has overloaded `get' so that when applied to an overlay it does
    overlay-get, ...

I see no possible harm in that, so we may as well be compatible.