From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: RMAIL slows
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:42:30 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DOMxq-0004h2-Dc@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m1DClPI-0004R9C@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1DD01Z-0001TZ-OU@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1DDQxE-0004RCC@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1DDjsO-0006Y1-Rj@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1DDlWc-0004RDC@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1DDuDM-0007ML-7F@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1DE7Br-0004RDC@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1DEKkT-0002Ju-MJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1DJzL7-0004ROC@rattlesnake.com>
	<m1vf6wj3ek.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m1DLPVr-0004RQC@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1DLme1-0003h5-Qt@fencepost.gnu.org> <85ll7m8nbq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1DM9cP-0007TS-Py@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1DMEtS-0004RRC@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1DMdVU-0003Rq-8F@fencepost.gnu.org> <m1DOCfU-0004RPC@rattlesnake.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114036906 12256 80.91.229.2 (20 Apr 2005 22:41:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 00:41:44 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DONsY-0001yF-Cd
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:41:06 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DONx9-00010D-8Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:45:51 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DONDr-0000Qs-Tm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:59:04 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DONDq-0000Po-8B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:59:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DON9d-0006nB-SE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:54:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DON0R-0004Jv-Rt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:45:11 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DOMxq-0004h2-Dc; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:42:30 -0400
Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com
In-reply-to: <m1DOCfU-0004RPC@rattlesnake.com> (bob@rattlesnake.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36204
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36204

       You might try killing the Rmail buffer and visiting the file again,
       in the old session.  Does this make it get fast again?

    If it does, it is only a very little.  I am not sure whether it does
    or whether the little difference is my imagination.

    However, after killing that instance of Emacs and starting a new
    instance, rmail sped up dramatically.

Well, there goes my guess.  We can only await more information from
you.

If you do xbacktrace while Rmail is doing whatever takes up the time,
you should get some useful information for us.  You need to do this
enough times so that you see a pattern.