From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:57:17 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DOGdh-0004Ys-2r@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3vf6izusy.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de>
	<16997.28602.876638.54728@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<jwvd5sqv4r8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114008910 10653 80.91.229.2 (20 Apr 2005 14:55:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:55:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, ich@frank-schmitt.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 20 16:55:09 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOGah-0002et-60
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:54:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOGfE-0008V3-0u
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:58:52 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOGey-0008Ru-Mz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:58:36 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DOGex-0008Rb-Tv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:58:36 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOGex-0008JJ-Kb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:58:35 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DOGgC-0000qo-Lg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:59:52 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DOGdh-0004Ys-2r; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:57:17 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvd5sqv4r8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:25:33 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36162
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36162

    I'd prefer to define the same `define-obsolete-variable-alias' macro as used
    in XEmacs.

That sounds useful.