From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: caml-mode and show-paren-mode
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:13:18 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DNvLi-0001yN-3v@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <quack.20050418T2219.87mzrvfimp@quack.cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113929356 16461 80.91.229.2 (19 Apr 2005 16:49:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:49:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 19 18:49:13 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DNvsp-0006Qt-FS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:47:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DNvxA-0004gB-P6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:52:00 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DNvs2-0002hu-2U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:46:42 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DNvs0-0002g7-Nf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:46:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNvs0-00085B-BS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:46:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DNvNr-00024c-E8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:15:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DNvLi-0001yN-3v; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:13:18 -0400
Original-To: quarl+dated+1114319893.e7da33@nospam.quarl.org
In-reply-to: <quack.20050418T2219.87mzrvfimp@quack.cs.berkeley.edu> (message
	from Karl Chen on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:19:42 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36117
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36117

So that people who don't know CAML could try to debug this,
can you send a precise, self-contained test case?