From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Stealth fontification GCs a lot
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:44:55 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DMGpD-0007mZ-Mg@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DLrVe-00055D-2l@monty-python.gnu.org>
	<200504140017.50453.jyavner@member.fsf.org>
	<fc339e4a05041323206b17f6c3@mail.gmail.com>
	<d3ljor$dg0$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113533935 5160 80.91.229.2 (15 Apr 2005 02:58:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:58:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 15 04:58:54 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DMH2h-00037T-JZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:58:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DMH67-0003Tw-Fl
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:02:23 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DMH58-0003Cq-9V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:01:22 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DMH56-0003CU-RO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:01:21 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMH2k-0002lq-Ki
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:58:54 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DMGq0-00082h-Iy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:45:44 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DMGpD-0007mZ-Mg; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:44:55 -0400
Original-To: Ralf Angeli <angeli@iwi.uni-sb.de>
In-reply-to: <d3ljor$dg0$1@sea.gmane.org> (message from Ralf Angeli on Thu, 14
	Apr 2005 13:25:27 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36008
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36008

    I don't really mind an initial fontification of the whole buffer.  A
    worse annoyance of stealth fontification is that this happens again
    and again after every modification of the buffer.

Are you saying that stealth fontification rechecks the whole buffer
after any change in it?