From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Stealth fontification GCs a lot
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:03:57 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DM9d7-0007XF-Ib@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DKoAe-0000rs-5j@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1hdief0gh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<01c53ee5$Blat.v2.4$0af9c0a0@zahav.net.il>
	<E1DLP8G-0007PG-Pc@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<01c53f91$Blat.v2.4$46f81b40@zahav.net.il>
	<jwv1x9f3h9o.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1DLmdI-0003bs-2k@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<01c540a6$Blat.v2.4$771152e0@zahav.net.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113507728 30177 80.91.229.2 (14 Apr 2005 19:42:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 14 21:42:06 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DMACw-0001o8-Ml
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:40:59 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DMAGI-0007PO-Jy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:44:26 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DM9rO-0001K9-1S
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:18:42 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DM9qy-0001A7-V7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:18:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DM9qy-00015F-GX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:18:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DM9dn-0005kW-SW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:04:39 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DM9d7-0007XF-Ib; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:03:57 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <01c540a6$Blat.v2.4$771152e0@zahav.net.il> (eliz@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35993
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35993

    > Is the idea that it avoids delays when you move to other parts of
    > the buffer, because they've been fontified while you were on the
    > phone?

    Yes.

Does anyone observe actual benefit from this?