From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Stealth fontification GCs a lot
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:31:38 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DLmeI-0003hR-0i@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DKoAe-0000rs-5j@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1hdief0gh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<01c53ee5$Blat.v2.4$0af9c0a0@zahav.net.il>
	<E1DLP8G-0007PG-Pc@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<01c53f91$Blat.v2.4$46f81b40@zahav.net.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113417101 23749 80.91.229.2 (13 Apr 2005 18:31:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 20:31:40 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DLmcs-0004Q0-8v
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:30:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DLmDR-0005lI-8B
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:03:53 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DLmCn-0005Zs-0s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:03:13 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DLmCl-0005Z1-9L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:03:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLmCl-0005Ys-5n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:03:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLmep-0008EG-Cq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:32:11 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DLmeI-0003hR-0i; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:31:38 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <01c53f91$Blat.v2.4$46f81b40@zahav.net.il> (eliz@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35945
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35945

Your stealth fontification settings seem much better to me, too.
Whether or not stealth fontification should be on by defaults, they
seem to be better parameters for it.