From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] enhanced mac drag-n-drop Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:24:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2dd8774c48ccbc9795d0d4ebe620f1e2@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113326787 12300 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2005 17:26:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 19:26:24 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLP88-0002xr-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:24:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLOiU-0003GS-UV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLOg3-0002PW-R2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:55:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLOfz-0002N8-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLOfz-0002Lt-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:55:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLP7i-0002DX-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DLP7J-0007GL-FL; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:24:02 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:59:00 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35904 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35904 > Does this mean that immediate_quit stops working? Most likely. Just like it currently doesn't work if you're inside a BLOCK_INPUT section. immediate_quit isn't used inside BLOCK_INPUT sections, but it is used in many places. All those places would appear to become bugs when -DSYNC_INPUT is used. Surely most of them can be fixed to use QUIT instead and will work well enough. However, it is necessary to fix each and every one.