From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] enhanced mac drag-n-drop Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2dd8774c48ccbc9795d0d4ebe620f1e2@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113274646 27214 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2005 02:57:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 02:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 04:57:25 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLBab-0001f8-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:57:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLBAp-0007yw-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:30:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLB9u-0007la-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:29:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLB9q-0007k4-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:29:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLB9q-0007is-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:29:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLBcH-0003S3-Qr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DLBcA-0000oX-MM; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:35:55 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35882 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35882 Indeed, it makes signal handling synchronous, i.e. more like cooperative multithreading: if you forget to use QUIT at some spot, it might lead to an Emacs process completely unresponsive to C-g. Does this mean that immediate_quit stops working?