From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Updates for TeX, SGML and rfc1345 quails and an assignment q
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:32:31 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DJuX9-0000Gk-Hn@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3zmwagk31.fsf@lugabout.cloos.reno.nv.us>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112971821 27287 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2005 14:50:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 08 16:50:20 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJunO-0000Va-B8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:49:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJuMu-0004SM-Oq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:21:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJuKh-0002s2-H2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:19:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJuGi-000178-Ig
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:15:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJuGf-0000xR-Hd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:15:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJuYS-0003jp-8Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:33:52 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DJuX9-0000Gk-Hn; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:32:31 -0400
Original-To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
In-reply-to: <m3zmwagk31.fsf@lugabout.cloos.reno.nv.us> (message from James
	Cloos on Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:58:58 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35764
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35764

    Given that these are merely matters of fact rather than truly creative
    changes, will an assignment be required before -- if approved -- they
    could be applied?

If it is just a matter of updating based on facts, and there's only
one right way to do it, we would not need copyright papers.