From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Bootstrap problem.
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:22:47 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DJk51-0007OF-UD@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87u0mtsesh.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87br91bbva.fsf@xs4all.nl>
	<87sm22cwiw.fsf@xs4all.nl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112930499 7069 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2005 03:21:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 08 05:21:37 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJk3R-0001cq-Az
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:21:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJjcr-0002q8-Pn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:41 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJjcb-0002nj-D0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:25 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJjcZ-0002la-8W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:23 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJjcZ-0002lA-3a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:23 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJk6A-0000ty-KZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:23:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DJk51-0007OF-UD; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:22:47 -0400
Original-To: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <87sm22cwiw.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Thu, 07
	Apr 2005 19:43:51 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35733
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35733

    We could let make clean delete loaddefs.el as well.  Or would that
    have any negative effects that I'm not aware of?

`make clean' should not delete loaddefs.el because that file is part
of the Emacs distribution.  However, if we want to change
bootstrapping to delete loaddefs.el at some stage, that's ok.  Just
don't put it inside of `make clean'.