From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `xterm-mouse-mode' has a bogus Custom group Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:22:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200504020351.j323ppS16391@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <16974.11752.332998.125628@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <200504021346.j32Dk3e19471@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <16978.12100.857894.861739@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <200504060000.j3600bm15264@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112930623 7281 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2005 03:23:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 08 05:23:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJk5j-0001rR-GA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:23:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJjf9-0004S7-UM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJjce-0002py-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJjca-0002mv-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJjca-0002lA-60 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJk5R-0000qI-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DJk4I-0007ID-9K; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:22:02 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:22:08 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35737 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35737 There are embedded Linux systems that are most definitely not GNU, and for example the system at runs Linux, but not the GNU system. Emacs is evidently not included, nor could it run without GNU libc. We can't demand correctness from others with regard to GNU/Linux that we are not willing to provide ourselves. I agree, but I've already explained why this is correct. In my opinion that should be the one that does not expose us as hypocrites: that hurts more than anything else could... My statements on the matter are sincere, not hypocritical. You have no grounds to accuse me of dishonesty, and I take offense.