From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tramp and VC integration: "calling user" Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:19:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87is386k0h.fsf@emptydomain.de> <1112377387.17621.111.camel@localhost> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112506593 18274 80.91.229.2 (3 Apr 2005 05:36:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kai@emptydomain.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 03 07:36:32 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHxmQ-0000iC-7I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:36:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHxo1-0007ai-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DHxmk-0006bE-PI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:36:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DHxmg-0006XF-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:36:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHxmg-0006Uu-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:36:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHxXK-0000uN-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:20:38 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DHxWX-0003as-Fl; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:19:49 -0500 Original-To: Andre Spiegel In-reply-to: <1112377387.17621.111.camel@localhost> (message from Andre Spiegel on Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:43:07 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35525 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35525 > #3 seems kludgy, so it shouldn't be that. I prefer #1. But #1 is in fact wrong. It is irrelevant who the owner of the file is (the same argument as I made concerning file-writable-p). I was only talking about how clean these various solutions seem. Whether any of them is *correct* is another matter--I don't know about that. You're the expert on that. If you think #2 is right and #1 is wrong, please use #2.