From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Advanced calendar usage in emacs-xtra.texi
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:19 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DFx3H-0004gH-Ni@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DFFm4-0005xm-DR@monty-python.gnu.org>
	<01c53236$Blat.v2.4$287360c0@zahav.net.il>
	<200503262121.j2QLLoJ17010@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112028317 14997 80.91.229.2 (28 Mar 2005 16:45:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:45:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gmorris@ast.cam.ac.uk, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 18:45:15 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxLZ-0000JG-2b
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:44:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxbg-0005Jd-Ok
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:00:52 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxZO-0004Kn-MT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:58:31 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxZM-0004Js-6e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:58:28 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFxUq-00022Z-V1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:53:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFx3I-0003ZZ-64
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:20 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DFx3H-0004gH-Ni; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:19 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200503262121.j2QLLoJ17010@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:21:50 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35259
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35259

    This leaves us with the question of what constitutes appropriate use
    of @inforef.

How about if you and whoever else is specifically interested
discuss this on bug-texinfo?