From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:41:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <002301c52e18$c9b014a0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200503211349.j2LDnxX12741@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <003401c52e20$d6f79c70$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <87hdj4vppf.fsf@jurta.org> <87br9begh1.fsf@jurta.org> <877jjy4ij3.fsf@jurta.org> <200503231419.j2NEJcL00651@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87k6nyz8xn.fsf@jurta.org> <200503231703.j2NH3BN03704@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87wtryqffi.fsf@jurta.org> <200503232116.j2NLGfp07884@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111733941 25879 80.91.229.2 (25 Mar 2005 06:59:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 07:59:00 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEimY-00012A-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:58:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEj1z-00036i-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:14:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DEivv-0008Rx-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DEivs-0008Q3-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEivq-0008Dh-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DEiW2-00070H-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:41:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DEiW1-0003k1-BP; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:41:53 -0500 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200503232116.j2NLGfp07884@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:16:41 -0600 (CST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35136 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35136 Anyway, rather than to argue over terminology, the important thing is: the user sees it, search has to find it. I wouldn't put it quite so strongly, but this is basically right. Search should find all sorts of markup that are in the text. Please, everyone, consider this question settled and stop arguing!