From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:21:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <002301c52e18$c9b014a0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200503211349.j2LDnxX12741@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <003401c52e20$d6f79c70$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <87hdj4vppf.fsf@jurta.org> <87br9begh1.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111559441 18667 80.91.229.2 (23 Mar 2005 06:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 07:30:40 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDzO1-0003jS-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 07:30:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDzfS-0007i1-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:48:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDzeZ-0007ad-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDzeR-0007VI-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDzeP-0007Sg-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:47:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDzFY-0005pt-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:21:52 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DDzFX-0005yb-Ic; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:21:51 -0500 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87br9begh1.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:29:05 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35024 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35024 1. Set both `invisible' and `display' properties. It seems the display engine ignores the `invisible' property when the `display' property is present. But isearch still respects it. I agree that that way is the best--if we decide that the current behavior when invisible and display are both present is the correct one. Maybe it is the right behavior; I see no reason to think it should be changed. But it would be nice to be really sure.