From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:59:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <002301c52e18$c9b014a0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200503211349.j2LDnxX12741@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <003401c52e20$d6f79c70$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <87hdj4vppf.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111539519 11928 80.91.229.2 (23 Mar 2005 00:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 01:58:38 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuCe-0000Tl-2t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:58:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuU2-0002WI-Pi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:16:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuSi-00027v-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuSZ-000221-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:14:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuSZ-00021y-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:14:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDuDL-0007iE-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:59:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DDuDK-0007M7-Rw; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:59:14 -0500 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:46:51 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35015 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35015 It would be wrong for preview-latex, probably one of the most important applications extensively using the display property. With all due respect, I have not been shown a reason to consider that package tremendously important. All user program are important to some extent, but I don't see why this one should be overridingly so.