From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Options menu
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:59:42 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DD01u-0001VH-19@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3sm2t5o70.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <x5sm2ti6sh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<010e01c52c0d$ac93ede0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
	<01c52c6d$Blat.v2.4$713e68a0@zahav.net.il>
	<006901c52c9b$bcf6c890$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111325045 745 80.91.229.2 (20 Mar 2005 13:24:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:24:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 20 14:24:05 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DD0PM-0005Mj-AI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:23:56 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DD0gF-0001Gf-RY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:41:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DD0K4-00088e-Uk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:18:29 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DD0K3-000888-CT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:18:27 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DD0K2-00081d-Ll
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:18:27 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DD01u-0001Js-LO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:59:42 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DD01u-0001VH-19; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:59:42 -0500
Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <006901c52c9b$bcf6c890$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
	(lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34814
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34814

I don't want to rethink the Emacs menu bar now.
It would be a big argument.  Let's not have the argument.

People, when someone starts a discussion about a substantial change in
Emacs, please don't argue about the details.  If you disagree with the
idea, please just say that this is the wrong time to consider such a
change.